By
the New Year most healthcare managers and administrators have completed
performance reviews for their employees. So, with the process fresh in
our minds now is a good as time as any to review performance reviews
themselves. Traditional Reviews Most
traditional reviews involve managers taking on a judgmental role,
telling employees how their work did or didn't fit the bill. And
although traditional reviews are good at sniffing out excellent and
very poor employees, they usually don't differentiate well among the
vast middle ground. Due to these problems, new types of
reviews are coming into play. Most require that evaluations be done not
for raises, promotions, or bonuses, but for growth, development, and
communication. These new forms of reviews may help managers, employees,
and peers gain a mutual understanding of what is really meant by "good
performance." The best performance reviews ultimately allow
managers and employees to communicate and share ideas, opinions, and
information. Below are three alternatives that do just this. Peer Reviews
Peer reviews help employees understand each others' work and allow
individuals to express themselves in a non-threatening manner. These
reviews often maintain a high level of worker acceptance and
involvement, as they tend to be stable, task-relevant, and accurate. Quick Tip:
Peer reviews may work best if all parties know that the reviews will
not be used for setting pay, promotion possibilities, or disciplinary
actions. That authority is still usually best left for management. Self-Reviews
Self-reviews are based on the idea that employees are most familiar
with their work, and that their involvement is essential. In this type
of review, employees rate themselves on a number of criteria, usually
with a formal survey form, and suggest improvements. Self-reviews help
to clarify individuals' own goals, and expose areas of weakness so they
may be worked on. Quick Tip: People may not see their own deficiencies as managers might, so self-reviews should be used alongside other review methods. 360 Degree Reviews
360 degree reviews combine self ratings and peer reviews. In other
words, feedback is sought from every angle. This allows employees to
discover how they are seen by others and to see their own skills and
style. 360 degree feedback ultimately provides people with a good
all-around perspective. Quick Tip: 360 degree
feedback may be given directly to employees, who have the option of
discussing them with their managers; or it may be given to the managers
for use in a feedback meeting. It's safe to say that most
healthcare facilities would benefit from better communications and
management. A good review system could help to improve communications,
while helping employees to increase their own effectiveness and to
clarify their own jobs and responsibilities. The review methods above
could not only increase the performance of the staff, but also help
them to work together with common goals and fewer obstacles. "You make the world a better place by making yourself a better person". —Scott Sorrell |